Full and Frank Disclosure in Divorce: KFK v DQD

Request a call from a family law solicitor


In England and Wales, parties to a divorce have a duty of full and frank financial disclosure. It ensures that both parties share all relevant financial information openly and honestly. This practice is crucial for fair settlements, particularly regarding financial arrangements and child custody. The recent case of KFK v DQD [2024] EWFC 78 vividly highlights the implications of neglecting this duty.

Overview of full and frank disclosure

Full and frank disclosure requires that both parties in a divorce fully disclose their financial assets and liabilities. This transparency is essential for:

  • Fair division of assets: Ensures assets and debts are divided equitably.
  • Maintenance decisions: Influences decisions on spousal and child support.
  • Avoidance of future claims: Reduces the likelihood of post-divorce disputes over finances.

The requirement is deeply embedded in the Family Law Act and reinforced by various legal precedents.

What constitutes full and frank disclosure?

Full and frank disclosure in divorce proceedings requires both parties to provide complete and honest information about all their financial assets and liabilities. This includes bank accounts, savings, investments, property interests, debts, and any other financial resources. Failure to disclose or hiding assets can lead to legal penalties and the possibility of having the divorce settlement revisited.

What are the consequences of failing to disclose financial information fully and frankly?

If a party fails to disclose financial information fully and frankly, the court can impose several sanctions. These can include financial penalties, redistribution of the settled assets, or even the overturning of a finalized divorce decree. In severe cases, non-disclosure can also lead to criminal charges of perjury if false statements are made under oath.

Case law: KFK v DQD [2024] EWFC 78

Case background

KFK v DQD was a contentious divorce proceeding, featuring several complex legal issues inherent to family law. The marriage, which lasted about 9.5 years without prior cohabitation, involved disputes over significant assets, primarily the equity in the property known as [Flatacre], valued at approximately £552,000. The parties had expended a substantial portion of their liquid assets on legal fees, which the court noted was “not well received.”

Core legal issues

  • Full and frank disclosure: The mutual accusations between H (husband) and W (wife) regarding undisclosed assets in China highlighted the critical issue of disclosure. The Judge emphasised the importance of disclosure, stating, “The duty of full and frank disclosure is owed to the court and not to be horse-traded or watered-down by perceived disclosure failures by the other side.” This highlighted the duty’s non-negotiable nature.
  • Document authenticity: The case also focused on the authenticity of documents, guided by FPR 22.16 and related rules. The late serving of a document by W led to procedural debates, with the Judge clarifying that proper notice was crucial for challenging a document’s authenticity.
  • Treatment of debts and advances: The court addressed suspicions regarding financial transfers to family members, describing them at one point as “very suspicious” and noting the lack of testimony from key individuals.
  • Valuation of business assets: The dispute over business valuations was another point of contention. W’s failure to seek a formal valuation of H’s business interests was criticised, with the court dismissing her self-conducted valuation.
  • Disposition of personal chattels: In a notable suggestion for resolving disputes over personal chattels, the Court proposed, “I make plain, if returned to me, that I reserve the option of requiring all disputed items to be sold on eBay or the like, with the parties each being free to bid for items or to enjoy a 50/50 division of whatever net sum is produced from the sale.” This reflected a practical approach to dispute resolution.

Judgment and Final Orders

The court ordered the sale of [Flatacre], with net proceeds divided 64/36 in H’s favour, emphasising a clean break to prevent future disputes. This decision factored in the parties’ conduct and the complications arising from their non-disclosure.

Implications for practitioners

Recorder Taylor’s management of the case offers critical insights, particularly his firm stance on disclosure and document authenticity. His pragmatic approach to chattel disputes also serves as a guide for handling similar issues in other cases.

Closing observations

The case brought to light the emotional and financial costs of adversarial divorce proceedings. Recorder Taylor poignantly remarked, “How much sorrow and cost might these parties have spared themselves if they had each been willing to approach things differently?

His comments and rulings promote a shift towards more amicable and transparent resolution methods in family disputes, aiming for efficiency and equity.

What steps can individuals take to ensure compliance with the duty of disclosure?

Individuals should maintain thorough records of all financial transactions and holdings, seek legal advice to understand their obligations, and ensure all disclosures are complete and accurate. Using professional financial advisors or accountants can also help ensure that all financial information is correctly reported and documented.

How can Expert Family Law assist?

Our panel of friendly and professional divorce lawyers have the expertise and experience to deal with your case professionally and with empathy. They will guide you through the divorce process, helping you to make the difficult decisions in an understanding, non-judgmental manner. They can also provide representation in the Family Court if required.

Please note that we are not a firm of solicitors. We have a panel of family law firms who we may pass your case on for a fee. Expert Family Law will not charge you, the client, for our service of passing on your case.

Our panel of divorce solicitors and experienced family law firms will help you to navigate a range of issues and disputes, such as financial matters and will assist you in reaching an agreement on such issues.

Each solicitor we work with is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

Whether you are going through a divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership, our panel of family law solicitors will provide pragmatic legal advice and assistance, guiding you through every step of the process.


Divorce Proceedings

Ancillary Relief

Domestic Abuse

Child arrangements

Expert Family Law

Keep up to date with the latest family law news